![]() ![]() So, perhaps it’s safer to just stick to the Foster’s story and a comparison with the film they actually made.įoster saved Alien 3 and gave it new life for this reviewer. This is a point addressing the film’s story and not Foster’s novelization. Yet, I can’t help but wonder what the story would have “felt” like to have had devoted monks instead of barbaric prisoners for the Xenomorph’s supper menu. Much of the theme was kept with the inclusion of Dillon’s character and his followers who chose to stay as custodians for a mining colony turned maximum-security facility. The original draft for Alien 3 was for Ripley to crash land on a planet in the outer system that was home to a monastery. Those familiar with the film will not find any spoilers here, for those who have not seen the film, there will be several plot points discussed in this review. Even ten years ago when I watched the Director’s Cut, I was still left wondering exactly what I was suppose to feel about Ellen Ripley’s final battle with the Xenomorph. Like so many-like millions- who were disappointed with David Fincher’s 1993 film, I did not expect Foster’s novel to change my mind about the “original” conclusion to the Alien franchise. ![]() WOW! I have not said that in a while and this reviewer surely did not expect that word to come from Alan Dean Foster’s 247-page novelization of Alien 3. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |